Council President Sean Elo-Rivera recently proposed the idea of using eminent domain to secure properties for new homeless shelters in San Diego. With the impending closure of several city-funded shelters, the need for replacement options has become urgent. The forced closures will result in a loss of 732 shelter beds by early 2025, emphasizing the need for quick action.

Elo-Rivera believes that considering all possible tools, including eminent domain, could provide leverage in negotiations with property owners for new shelter sites. On the other hand, Mayor Todd Gloria and his team are hesitant to pursue eminent domain, citing the lengthy legal process and other challenges that could delay the opening of new shelters.

The disagreement between the two sides came to light through a series of memos exchanged in June and July. While Elo-Rivera advocated for exploring the option of seizing properties for shelters, Gloria’s administration rejected the idea, emphasizing the complexities involved.

The City Attorney’s Office also weighed in on the matter, expressing concerns about the administration’s decision to forgo eminent domain. Assistant City Attorney Jean Jordan highlighted the potential benefits of using eminent domain to acquire shelter sites efficiently and at a fair value.

Despite the opposition from Gloria’s team, Elo-Rivera remains steadfast in his belief that eminent domain should be considered as a viable option to address the shelter crisis. Drawing parallels to past instances where eminent domain was used for city projects, Elo-Rivera argues that the tool should not be dismissed in the current situation.

While Gloria’s office views eminent domain as a lengthy and complicated process, Elo-Rivera contends that the city should leverage all available tools to secure new shelter sites quickly. The debate continues as city officials grapple with finding solutions to the impending shelter closures.